Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Liberal Campaign Consultant Threatens Bloggers
This story over at BillHobbs.com is bizarre. No, it's not bizarre to think that a liberal doesn't believe in the First Amendment; they frequently practice the "free speech for me, but not for thee" mantra patented by the ACLU.
However, it is bizarre to think that a person whose occupation is supposedly centered around advising other political animals how to handle situations and address conflict could be so horrendous at handling this situation.
Threatening Terry Frank was bad. Coming after Bill Hobbs and telling him what he can and cannot publish on his blog is darn stupid. On top of that, Bill Fletcher (the liberal in question) makes a threat against Hobbs that can be taken as potentially physical in nature (see the comments section).
Michael Silence calls this a "Blogosphere brouhaha." Fletcher better leave it at just that. He doesn't want to see this thing in court - civil or criminal.
However, it is bizarre to think that a person whose occupation is supposedly centered around advising other political animals how to handle situations and address conflict could be so horrendous at handling this situation.
Threatening Terry Frank was bad. Coming after Bill Hobbs and telling him what he can and cannot publish on his blog is darn stupid. On top of that, Bill Fletcher (the liberal in question) makes a threat against Hobbs that can be taken as potentially physical in nature (see the comments section).
Michael Silence calls this a "Blogosphere brouhaha." Fletcher better leave it at just that. He doesn't want to see this thing in court - civil or criminal.